madmonq’s joint


Tucana vs Tequlia

Some successful people have patterned themselves after other famous people in order to duplicate his/her accomplishments. Madonna/Britney Spears, Aretha Franklin/Mary J Blige, Richard Nixon/George W Bush. With that in mind

Tila Tucana Tila Tequila

Both sing

Both have a mainly humanoid appearance.

One is described as a ‘feline, three-dimensional creature’. The other is known for her two-dimensional personality.

One is mostly made of plastic and is voice enhanced by electronic devises. The other is from another planet.

One was featured in a cheezy 70s TV show. The other is just cheezy.

Participated in racy photo shoots.

Both are more known for their notoriety than talent.

Next…



Cultural Divestiture
February 18, 2008, 10:22 am
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , ,

There’s nothing on this site about pet clothing, pictures of kitties with a hat, that kind of thing.  A work in progress I hope.

http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.wordpress.com/2008/01/19/8-barack-obama/

http://www.catsandbeer.com/music/the-top-10-rap-songs-white-people-love



Art Rock of Love

The Artist Formerly Known as “The Star Child

The Paintings Formerly known as Blank Canvases

Part of the joy in sharing this is the fact that he had a “show” at the Wentworth Art Gallery at the Riverside Square Mall in Hackensack NJ.

For those of you who don’t know, an art show opening at the Riverside Square Mall is a little like the ribbon cutting ceremony at a local supermarket. I worked at that supermarket for a while. Made me wish Lex Luthor was successful in 1979. Good for Hackensack, bad for Paul Stanley.

I wonder if he went to the Couch House Diner across the highway afterward? Or got an after hours tour of the U.S.S. Ling? At least he’s not wearing a babushka on his head pretending he’s not bald.

Please to enjoy the tackiness.

Happy Valentime’s Day



President Huckabee, Squirrel Eater
February 12, 2008, 12:16 pm
Filed under: TV, carny life, election, faith, god, media, politics, religion, republican | Tags: , , , , , ,

From “Meet the Press” February 10th, 2008

MR. RUSSERT: All right. Before you go, I have to ask you about this comment on…

GOV. HUCKABEE: All right.

MR. RUSSERT: “Morning Joe”’s program back in January.

GOV. HUCKABEE: OK.

MR. RUSSERT: “When I was in college, we used to take a popcorn popper–because that was the only thing” many of us–”they would let us use in the dorms”…

GOV. HUCKABEE: Yeah.

MR. RUSSERT: …”and we would fry squirrel in the popcorn poppers in the dorm room.”

GOV. HUCKABEE: Yeah. Yeah. We really did that. We really did.

MR. RUSSERT: Did you eat them?

GOV. HUCKABEE: Well, of course you–we ate them.

MR. RUSSERT: What does it taste like?

GOV. HUCKABEE: I should say it tastes a lot like chicken, but it doesn’t.

MR. RUSSERT: What’s it taste like?

GOV. HUCKABEE: It, it tastes like squirrel. It’s not the best thing in the world but, you know, when you go squirrel hunting, you got to do something with those things. And part of it was just to say we could do it. I mean, it was a college thing. I mean, but fried squirrel is a Southern delicacy. You got to know that.

MR. RUSSERT: But you’re off the squirrel now?

GOV. HUCKABEE: I haven’t eaten fried squirrel I think since college. Thank the Lord. I don’t…

MR. RUSSERT: This may help you in Virginia.

GOV. HUCKABEE: It may kill me up–in other states, however.

I can’t believe some seriously consider Huckabee a competitive candidate. I used to think he was O.K. Politicians say a lot of crap when they’re running for office. Like everyone else with no brain and a little experience I know to take election year oaths with a grain of salt. And Huckabee really seems like a nice person. But you mean to tell me that people still pretend to not know that TV preachers steal from old ladies?

MR. RUSSERT: But shouldn’t he cooperate and turn over the materials that Senator Grassley requested?

GOV. HUCKABEE: As far as I know, he will fulfill his responsibilities. He’s taking legal counsel. But you know what? The whole issue with Kenneth Copeland/Chuck Grassley is not an issue that I’m dealing with as a presidential candidate. It’s not a part of whether or not I ought to be running for president. And what I’m saying is that I think he’s taking his legal counsel, finding out what he’s supposed to do and where he’s supposed to cooperate, but not in, in any way yielding over the constitutional rights he has under the First Amendment to be not just a person of free speech, but also a person of freedom of religion.

MR. RUSSERT: But if you tell him “I stand with you against Congress,” and then he raises money for you…

GOV. HUCKABEE: Behind him.

MR. RUSSERT: …isn’t that interfering in an investigation?

GOV. HUCKABEE: No, it’s not interfering with an investigation. I–it’d be interfering if I called up Chuck Grassley and said lay off Kenneth Copeland. I’ve not done that, nor would, would I do that. Because I think Kenneth Copeland will ultimately have to provide some responsible answer to the questions that have been raised. And, and that’s fine. And Senator Grassley, he can request whatever information he needs. He’ll have the legal authority to do what he does, or he won’t be able to get it done. That’s all in the world that, that has to happen.

MR. RUSSERT: But he should provide all the information that’s been requested?

GOV. HUCKABEE: If the information is reasonable and it’s not violating the, the rights that Kenneth Copeland has. I, I do have a little concern. It’s a little chilling when you start thinking about is Congress going to start going after nonprofit organizations? And if so, are they going to do all nonprofits? Are they going to start looking at Moveon.org? Are they going to start looking at some of these organizations, where every dime comes from? If, if we’re going to do it, let’s open it up and make sure everybody coughs up the information.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23095171/page/2/

That doesn’t excuse him from not releasing infomation does it? It does informs us as to Huck Dawg’s biases. By including Moveon.com in the same conversation he intimates Copeland as a PAC, not a private citizen. A partisan organization who lobby for their agenda, not always scrupulously. Between that and the millions the guy has earned from graft that can only make his associations more suspicious.

Old Huck Finn’s reasoning is the same as a kid caught chewing gum in class. Which makes him either very naive or a bad liar. By basically saying he’d obstruct an investigation means the latter unfortunately. Neither makes him an attractive candidate. Apparently evangelical types share poor lying abilities. Bush is always blurting out his uninformed opinions, mixed with lies to fill the gap, without an inkling of the implications. Unlike Bush Huckabee is rarely nasty. (Bush usually defends his positions by working a nasty tone into his statements. They are supposed to make us back down from questioning his logic. Ha!)

I could handle the whole B.S defense of marriage act, creationism over evolution, abortion abolition talking points. Every politician talks junk in order to appeal to their base. He’s stated some of the more agreeable moderate positions. He also wouldn’t be able to get half of that sort of extremism past in Congress anyway. But adding clumsy lying into the mix indicates he’s not White House-worthy. We want our politicians to successfully lie. If he hadn’t mentioned eating squirrel far past the years when he had to, the rest of his nonsense wouldn’t look that bad. It also proves he’s a terrible liar.

Huckabees’ comments about McCain in 2006

“I have a hard time seeing him being elected president, just because I think, at times, some of his views have alienated very important segments of the Republican Party.”

Let’s hope it was the squirrel eating branch of the party.

Squirrel eating alone should not bar someone from the White House. Lord knows we all have a past. Bad lying, backward azz thinking and popcorn squirrel should.

Log this one under carny life.



What’s the safe word?
February 6, 2008, 6:01 pm
Filed under: carny life, christianity, christians, church, duggernauts, faith, jesus, quiverful, quiverfull, religion

Some more than other but not according to the bible, WW.

A few months ago I blogged on the bizarre faction within extreme Christianity called quiverfull aka Duggernauts! Quiverful movement

“Advocates believe God controls via Providence how many children are conceived and born, pointing to Bible verses that describe God acting to”open and close the womb”. Continual “openness to children”, to conception during routine sexual intercourse, irrespective of timing of the month during the ovulation cycle, is considered by Quiverfull adherents as part of their Christian calling in submission to the lordship of Christ”

Before we go any further, time for the cheap jokes.

in submission to the lordship of Christ

in order to form a pee-wee football league

routine sexual intercourse

Routine being the key word. Like the lunch special at the senior center. Wednesday is unflavored sherbet. I can’t even imagine what sort of lack-of-enthusiasm ‘routine’ means for them. Like helping someone move that you don’t even like. Coupled with the mandate to repopulate New Orleans every 9 months. I can’t think of anything else to kill the moment further, except maybe asking their mothers to participate.

irrespective of timing of the month

Because god created the menstrual cycle just to fake you out. He can get a woman pregnant during her menstrual cycle but she needs a Christian dating service and a prarie dress to get her a date. You’ve gotta respect that kind of crazy suicide bomber-type faith from both parties.

Quiverfull is also known in carny jargon as “the Clown Car Gag.” You know that bit where hundreds of clowns tumble out of a very small car? I’ll not explain which is the clown and which is the car. Or that clowns are very scary. I said all that to say that I was naive enough to believe it to be a strange, depressing and oppressive idea within the Christian Right. Then I found this.

http://oleaeuropea.wordpress.com/2007/12/19/a-little-kinkiness-for-your-wednesday/

and

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/christiandomesticdiscipline/

http://lovingdd.blogspot.com/2006/03/tearful-discipline.html

Then I realized it was just another strange, depressing and gender oppressive idea within the christian right.

I don’t go looking for this sort of thing but I am drawn to it and it to me.

And I still don’t get it. Is this how they keep things spicy? Was I wrong about what goes on at the senior center? When did the Bible get this racy? And why isn’t this taught at my local corner church? Or is it? Should I get up that hour earlier for Sunday School? Nah. Does this mean the cross was just payback for a particularly rough night?

Although the bible is full of immorality and disturbing images, American Christianity tends to coat-tail the safe side of pop culture as much possible. Usually after the trend has been exhausted and 10 years later. But Christian BDSM?

So what’s the safe word? In this context if she were to yell “Jesus!” wouldn’t that be a good thing?

I can’t wait for Christian “2 Girls, One Cup”20 years from now. Then they’ll know what going to church feels like.

Anyone have any suggestions for the safe word?