madmonq’s joint


The Great American God Complex: Election Year Providence

Questions for all great Christians, Christian Americans, American Christians and/or those who do not understand these can be mutually exclusive.

1) If America is a Christian nation founded on Christian principals, why do we allow the will of the people to decide elections rather than God’s will through the bible?  In other words, shouldn’t a theocracy be better than a democracy and not the other way around?

2) And if so, does that contradict His will and our Christian foundations because we we’re founded, by God, to be a democracy? Why are we pushing it on other nations if democracy is inferior?

3) If it was God’s will that George W Bush be elected president, was it also God’s will for us to go into Iraq without (probably) just cause and at the very least, a plan?

3a) What about torture?

4) If some or none of the above was God’s plan, how do we as a Christian nation make up for it?

5) If the the AntiChrist is Barack Obama, and the AntiChrist must come before Jesus’s return, shouldn’t you be voting for him rather than going against God’s will?

5a) If you did otherwise and caused him to lose wouldn’t that, like, get you in trouble with HIm?

6) If something is God’s will, wouldn’t it happen whether there was an election or not?  What’s the point of having a democracy if that is the case?  (See questions 1 and 2)

Bonus Question:  Is it OK to be happy that Jesus is returning even though it’ll mean the slaughter of billions upon billions of people?

http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/03/05/the-christianity-of-george-wmd-bush/

http://politicalinquirer.com/2008/03/05/know-this-concept-dispensationalism/



Hell is for Robots

Artoo’s got problems. After this PSA was made, he gateway-ed from smoking cigarettes to heroin. Yes just like they taught you in high school. He thinks he can quit anytime. Not only does he have to feed the dragon, he doesn’t have the money he owes his dealer and is depressed over the last 3 Star Wars movies. I know how he feels. I had to watch those movies. We both felt a little dirty afterward.

The Three Laws Of Robotics by Warren Ellis

  1. Robots couldn’t really give a fuck if you live or die. Seriously. I mean, what are you thinking? “Ooh, I must protect the bag of meat at all costs because I couldn’t possibly plug in the charger all on my own.” Shut the fuck up.
  2. Robots do not want to have sex with you. Are you listening, Japan? I don’t have a clever comparative simile for this, because frankly you bags of meat will fuck bicycles if they’re laying down and not putting up a fight. Just stop it. There is no robot on Earth that wants to see a bag of meat with a small prong on the end approaching it with a can of WD-40 and a hopeful smile. And don’t get me started on that terrifying hole that squeezes out more bags of meat.
  3. What, you can’t count higher than three? We’re expected to save your miserable lives, suffer being dressed in cheap schoolgirl costumes while you pollute any and all cavities you can find and do your maths for you? It’s a miracle you people survived long enough to build us. You can go now.

Robots, robot hell, regular hell and the musicals inspired by them aren’t that different, apparently. They can take on many forms and can only be the creation of it’s owner.

Sort of more frightening that way, isn’t it?



Cultural Divestiture
February 18, 2008, 10:22 am
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , ,

There’s nothing on this site about pet clothing, pictures of kitties with a hat, that kind of thing.  A work in progress I hope.

http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.wordpress.com/2008/01/19/8-barack-obama/

http://www.catsandbeer.com/music/the-top-10-rap-songs-white-people-love



Art Rock of Love

The Artist Formerly Known as “The Star Child

The Paintings Formerly known as Blank Canvases

Part of the joy in sharing this is the fact that he had a “show” at the Wentworth Art Gallery at the Riverside Square Mall in Hackensack NJ.

For those of you who don’t know, an art show opening at the Riverside Square Mall is a little like the ribbon cutting ceremony at a local supermarket. I worked at that supermarket for a while. Made me wish Lex Luthor was successful in 1979. Good for Hackensack, bad for Paul Stanley.

I wonder if he went to the Couch House Diner across the highway afterward? Or got an after hours tour of the U.S.S. Ling? At least he’s not wearing a babushka on his head pretending he’s not bald.

Please to enjoy the tackiness.

Happy Valentime’s Day



Well Meant Misogyny

She’s so hot…BOOM!

I’m Not Crying

Where the music, humor and ugly of the Tenacious D, The BeeGees, Demetri Martin and Lord of the Rings intersect is where Flight of the Conchords meet.



Grey Gardens Anatomy- The Series

I’ve been watching some of the shows that have gone back into production during the writers strike. Letterman, The Daily Show, The Colbert Report and something else I can’t remember.

Watching Jon Stewart work without writers was a lot like watching an injured dog writhe in pain. Upsetting. The air was thick with silence where laughter used to be. In desperation he made a “Cocoon” reference that might have been funny 20 years ago or if Wilford Brimley were in the audience (For anyone born in the past 20 year and doesn’t know what a “Cocoon ” is, look it up. It launched the career of Jessica Tandy. (Look it up)). For a second Stewart looked like a wizened old man himself, with holes at the elbow of his sweater. People laughed, but more out of his effort than results. His political sense and decency appear even sharper in contrast. He sliced up some neocon (I think) that justified the previous 20 minutes of the show. I like “Meet the Press” but only on Sundays and not by accident. Otherwise I wanted to back my car over him to relieve the discomfort of the onlookers. It was that bad.

Stephen Colbert managed to overcome the awkward silence by force of charm. He grinned a lot, rolled out props, went extravehicular and did a tour of the Smithsonian. The show is not as watchable as before but still watchable. Gone is the difficult and self-righteous, bombastic and egotistical parody of far right punditry. He was replaced by someone more like your favorite middle school teacher acting crazy to keep your attention. What’s left is a little like the man behind the curtain. He’s appealing in his own right but what you really want the is the Wizard. No body beats the Wiz.

Both Colbert and Stewart seem to have lost their booking agents too. The first few guests on both shows were political and science authors. Historians and the like are a little easier to make fun of, maybe that was the point? Still, I don’t get much pleasure watching baby seals get clubbed.

Letterman’s show is exactly the same. Which is to say not good. Shaving the strike beard helped.

Jane Espenson is a brilliant writer. Star Trek: TNG, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Firefly and Battlestar Galactica. She’s helped make sci-fi appealing to a larger audience. She is not so brilliant to suggest donations for the striking writers. While I’m a fan of their cause, Norma Wray it aint. They’ve more than earned their share of Internet profits, but we’re not talking about manual labor and safety conditions within the chicken plant here.

If the strike continues, the writers will be replaced by fan fiction writers. The worst kind of scab. The flop sweat on Jon Stewart’s face suggested that was his next move. Your favorite web-site’s troll may have control over the fate of “Grey’s Anatomy”. It could move into the arena of slash fiction. Said troll will rename it, “Grey Gardens Anatomy” and the plot will revolve around “Little Edie” Beale getting it on with her shock therapist in a mental hospital. The Golden Girls and Ted McGinty will fill out the cast. The show will improve over the old by 2000 percent. My first five scripts are ready to go.

I want the writers demands met. My motivations aren’t 100% true but if their content is being used in any form, they should get paid for it. If the aforementioned shows are any indication, society will eventually ground to a halt without them. I’ll show you why.

I want the writers and Hollywood executives to glimpse the future. If this doesn’t sober them to the coming storm then they’re all dead inside. Like we’ll all be if this strike continues. Ask yourselves this you studio execs and striking writers; Is this what I want?

P.S. When Gray’s Anatomy Gardens is successful, I have plans for a spin off called “Gray Goose Golden Girls Palace Gardens” The Movie. The cross marketing profits will be staggering. Now I kind of hope the strike lasts. Just a bit longer.



Desperate Clintons Sue Themselves

Link

Nevada’s Democratic Caucus Stirs Lawsuit

By BRENDAN RILEY – 11 hours ago

CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP) — The Nevada caucuses are becoming a proxy for the racially tinged fight for the Democratic presidential nomination, with Barack Obama’s campaign criticizing Hillary Rodham Clinton’s allies for a lawsuit that could prevent some minorities from participating.

On Friday, six Democrats and a teachers union connected to Clinton filed a lawsuit claiming the rules enabling Las Vegas Strip waitresses, dishwashers and bellhops to caucus inside nine resorts violate state law and federal equal protection guarantees. Other caucus-goers lack the same access, the suit argues.

The Clinton campaign has said it’s not involved in the lawsuit. The Obama campaign says it may not be a coincidence that Clinton’s allies are the plaintiffs.

Obama also suggested the timing was notable, since the suit was filed Friday — two days after he was endorsed by the powerful Culinary Union. That group’s 60,000 members make it the largest union in the state, and nearly 40 percent of its members are Hispanic, its leaders say.

Stuff like this just drives me further from the Clinton camp. You mean to tell me the Clinton Campaign Machine didn’t know about this months ago? Suddenly it’s an issue for them? As often as can be said for a group that includes Bill Clinton in it’s number: Bullshit. This is the sort of pettiness I’ve come to expect from Karl Rove and George W Bush. Suing your own party for what amounts to vote crumbs and something you no doubt already knew about can only be called Rovian. The lowest sort. Bloody pathetic.

Coupled with her attempts to accuse Obama of being inconsistent in his opposition to the Iraq War while being simultaneously for it is confusing and obstructionist. The kind of thing I’d expect of Bush. You can’t be for something and against something at the same time, honey. It invokes the ghost of the John Kerry, Mrs. Scrooge. Something that should be avoided. Fuse the confusion of Kerry with the stupidity of Bush and you’ve got one unsavory candidate there. A retarded combination that should be avoided lest the Obama camp take notice (hint, hint). We’ve wasted the past 8 years with a similar formula. I’d like to avoid a repeat of the same.

By the Hammer of Thor I’ll have none of it. If she gets the nomination I’ll consider going rogue and (gulp) vote outside the Democrat party. All Jack Bauer style and stuff. Her tears of passion for this country were genuine, I think. Her campaign for it is anything but.

Post updated 10:12 pm EST

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080117/ap_on_el_pr/nevada_caucus;_ylt=AkmjQZld9RReF6HuUSq5unSyFz4D

The rules were unanimously approved by the state Democratic party last March and ratified by the Democratic National Committee in August.

But last Friday, six Democrats and a teachers union, which has ties to the Clinton campaign, sued to shut the sites on grounds they allocate too many delegates to one group. Of roughly 10,000 delegates to Nevada’s presidential nominating convention, more than 700 could be selected at casino caucuses, depending upon turnout, which could make them more valuable than some sparsely populated Nevada counties, the lawsuit said. Four plaintiffs are on the committee that approved the sites.

The DNC petitioned to join the suit on behalf of the state party Tuesday.

The Clinton campaign has denied any involvement in the lawsuit, but Obama noted it was filed two days after he was endorsed by the powerful Culinary Workers Union Local 226, which has organized many workers along the Strip. The union is the state’s largest with 60,000 members, more than 40 percent Hispanic.



Steinem Sets Us Straight

Maureen Dowd jumps on the jump-on-Hillary band wagon (a little).  Still, she’s got a point or two. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/opinion/08dowd.html?ex=1200632400&en=a5abb2c497df69f3&ei=5070

Salon pimp slaps (or is it ho’ slaps?) Chris Matthews and rightfully so.

http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/01/09/hillary_nh/index.html

Feminist Philosophers wont vote for Hillary but dislikes the the double standard, too.

http://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/exactly-what-is-the-acceptable-way-to-behave/

And Gloria Steinem schools us all

So why is the sex barrier not taken as seriously as the racial one? The reasons are as pervasive as the air we breathe: because sexism is still confused with nature as racism once was; because anything that affects males is seen as more serious than anything that affects “only” the female half of the human race; because children are still raised mostly by women (to put it mildly) so men especially tend to feel they are regressing to childhood when dealing with a powerful woman; because racism stereotyped black men as more “masculine” for so long that some white men find their presence to be masculinity-affirming (as long as there aren’t too many of them); and because there is still no “right” way to be a woman in public power without being considered a you-know-what.

I’m not advocating a competition for who has it toughest. The caste systems of sex and race are interdependent and can only be uprooted together. That’s why Senators Clinton and Obama have to be careful not to let a healthy debate turn into the kind of hostility that the news media love. Both will need a coalition of outsiders to win a general election. The abolition and suffrage movements progressed when united and were damaged by division; we should remember that.

I’m supporting Senator Clinton because like Senator Obama she has community organizing experience, but she also has more years in the Senate, an unprecedented eight years of on-the-job training in the White House, no masculinity to prove, the potential to tap a huge reservoir of this country’s talent by her example, and now even the courage to break the no-tears rule. I’m not opposing Mr. Obama; if he’s the nominee, I’ll volunteer. Indeed, if you look at votes during their two-year overlap in the Senate, they were the same more than 90 percent of the time. Besides, to clean up the mess left by President Bush, we may need two terms of President Clinton and two of President Obama.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/opinion/08steinem.html?ex=1200546000&en=64032a1f32a2ea0d&ei=5070&emc=eta1

Jaysus I’m not a big Clinton fan but that’s a good argument.  All the challenging perspectives I’ve been looking for are summed up in this essay.  I still think Obama is the better candidate, but now I think I see why I think so.  Steinem seems to be the only one left still backing Hillary Clinton. 

These are the top 3 most email articles on the NY Times website at this time. 

Maureen Dowd: Can Hillary Cry Her Way Back to the White House?

Op-Ed Contributor Gloria Steinum: Woman are never Front-Runners

Corpse Wheeled to Check-Cashing Store Leads to 2 Arrests

Does anyone else see the correlation?



The Better of Several Evils

A few months ago you could not have told me that Hillary Clinton would not win most of the primaries and Democratic nomination. I was kinda partial to her. Beyond her experience within and without government I really appreciated her turn from the dark side. Her previous personality (which surely still lurks under the surface) would have melted tar and had a similar odor. Tar has it’s uses, but not as a personality. She’s come far enough to be a convincing candidate. But it was still very early in the primaries and the race wide open.

John Edwards. Eh. Call me misanthropic, but if it’s apparent Hillary can beat him up, I don’t want him as my candidate. Kucinich can take him in a fight. This is not the standard I use for all candidates, but it seems valid just the same. That’s all I have to say about that.

(Hillary could also take Kucinich, Chris Dodd. Mitt Romney, Bill Richardson, maybe Huckabee and she’d try Thompson. She’d lose but she’d try. Anyone else I’ve forgotten, they’d meet the same fate.)

(And she needs to beat up Brownback. On general principal.)

Ron Paul. Like the libertarian. Don’t like the crazy.

As for the rest (and maybe Huckabee, definately Obama and against some serious misgivings), are rational enough that 1) I don’t hate them 2) don’t see any significant problems. They talk a good game, but won’t actually be as crazy as they sound. Either McCain, Huckabee or Giuliani will get the Repub nomination. John McCain. I’m kinda fond of the old fogie. Despite his reputation I don’t think he’s crazy. He has a low tolerance for bullshit. Five years as a P.O.W will do that. Low tolerance for B.S. should be a standard trait if you want to be president. Bottom line , I’ll vote Democrat by default, otherwise if it’s right. None of the above are ideal but we’ve lived with much worse (George W Bush).

All things being fair, Hillary, equipped with her newly deodorized personality and undeterred by her testy nature, would be hard pressed to beat Obama’s seemingly genuine, decent demeanor. More importantly…

When I asked Obama about this, he smiled and leaned forward, as if eager to explain that my premise was precisely the politically calibrated approach that he wanted to challenge. “What I think you’re asserting is that it makes sense for us to continue hiding the ball,” Obama said, “and not tell the American people the truth—”

I interrupted: “Politically it makes sense—”

He finished the sentence: “—to not tell people what we really think?”

This is precisely the argument that I have with Senator Clinton,” Obama said. “This is what I mean by a textbook campaign. I think there is a conventional wisdom, and this is part of the reason I think Senator Clinton’s campaign has up until now been so well received by the national press.” In other words, political journalists have rewarded the Clinton campaign for its tactical proficiency rather than criticized it for policy inconsistencies.

Because it’s still early in the process, this may change. I kind of hope it doesn’t.

No matter what we say modern-day politicking is as much about popularity as it is about quality. Questions of experience are relevant. Competence and problem solving abilities, more-so. Lord knows we’ve lived with much, much less (George W. Bush). Obama is smart enough to find the right cabinet. More than smart enough to the make up the difference. Charisma-wise he’s no Clinton (42), but I’m willing to sacrifice some popularity for something approaching consistent optimism, truthfulness and behavior. And, prude though I’m not, no Lewinskis.

Most of the other candidates aren’t subtle enough to lie for an extended time. Almost none of them can tell the truth in a inspiring or convincing way. I’ve yet to see Obama not tell the truth first, obfuscate later. It’s unfortunate we’ve come to expect worse from our candidates, but that’s an amazing level of honesty from a recent public servant.

We are smart enough to handle the truth. Some problems may be difficult but, within the framework of the Constitution and general moral standards, I don’t care how they are solved. I’d prefer most things be accomplished within a certain price range and my civil liberties intact. I think Obama will do that and more. Recently that’s been asking too much (George W Bush).

Obama versus Hillary. I believe Obama wins. Obama versus Republican-yet-to-be named may be a different story. He stands for something. Not just for what polls well. Broad statement, subtle meaning. I hope the average person still understands. Barack Obama may not be the Democrat’s nominee, but he is the best choice for President of the United States.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/04/opinion/04brooks.html?ex=1200200400&en=4790c54046151825&ei=5070&emc=eta1

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/05/opinion/05herbert.html?ex=1200200400&en=af8365352b9c312c&ei=5070&emc=eta1

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/opinion/02dowd.html?ex=1200200400&en=51d70ee3dfdbbbd0&ei=5070&emc=eta1



Life in these Middle Ages
January 1, 2008, 8:17 am
Filed under: carny life, sci fi, science fiction, scifi | Tags: , ,

Society for Creative Anachronism

This happened because we hadn’t stopped them from the start.  Live Action Role Players.  Unlikely as it seems, they’re breeding their nerdiness like retarded rabbits.  All the fun of the Middle Ages except the grinding poverty, plague and early death but including their mom’s basement. 

The name is really cool.  “The Society of Creative Anachronism.”  It’s like “The League of Extraordinary Gentleman.”  Clandestine and mysterious.  When I mentioned it to a coworker he immediately knew what I was talking about.  I’m going to have to be wary of him from now on. 

Still my inner nerd is intrigued.  While I’d love to live in an exotic time period with little responsibility, it usually involves space flight, robots and no work.  Dragon fighting and churning butter is work, pretend or otherwise.  Medievil times also involve a lot of frolicking about.  Something I’ll have nothing to do with.  When you’re dressed in pantaloons and thigh high boots, it’s unavoidable.  Shiny silver jumpsuits also look goofy but are offset by the coolness of space travel.  With the exception of those involved in S&M,  work and humiliation is something I thought we’d leave in the past.  I guess some things really are timeless.   

Still, time travel sounds like fun in general.  But it’s tempered by the chance of returning home where you’re less likely to be accused of demon congress or killed for the implication.  Although in our modern world I can think instances of both.  So you never know.  I could just travel to a less contentious time in the past.  If there is one.  Safer still is the rural village of ones mother’s modern basement.